When devising a trial strategy to defend against a VTL §1192-2 charge predicated upon a breath test score, the distinction between this section and VTL §1192-3 — common law DWI — becomes very important.
People v. Miller (1993)
In People v. Miller, 199 A.D.2d 692 (3d Dept. 1993), the Court upheld the defendant's conviction for VTL §1192-2 where the defendant's BAC score was .14% as shown by a chemical test of his breath. In noting the distinction between VTL §1192-2 and VTL §1192-3, the Court wrote:
"VTL §1192(2) and (3) are separate crimes having distinct elements, namely, 1192(2) is based upon the defendant's blood alcohol content while 1192(3) is based upon the manner a defendant operated his vehicle and his condition."
Miller, 199 A.D.2d at 695.
Charged with DWI in Western New York?
Get answers about your specific case — speak directly with an attorney.
Call 716.633.0374The Key Distinction
VTL §1192-2 is based upon the defendant's blood alcohol content, while VTL §1192-3 is based upon the manner in which a defendant operated his vehicle and his condition. These are separate crimes with distinct elements, and this distinction is critical when constructing a defense strategy.
If you have questions about your case, contact Law Office of Peter J. Todoro, Jr., PC at 716-633-0374.