When devising a trial strategy to defend against a VTL §1192-2 charge predicated upon a breath test score, the distinction between this section and VTL §1192-3 (common law DWI) becomes very important.
People v. Miller (1993)
In People v. Miller, 199 A.D.2d 692 (3d Dept. 1993), the Court upheld the defendant's conviction for VTL §1192-2 where the defendant's BAC score was .14% as shown by a chemical test of his breath. In noting the distinction between VTL §1192-2 and VTL §1192-3, the Court wrote:
"VTL §1192(2) and (3) are separate crimes having distinct elements, namely, 1192(2) is based upon the defendant's blood alcohol content while 1192(3) is based upon the manner a defendant operated his vehicle and his condition."
Miller, 199 A.D.2d at 695.
Charged with DWI in Western New York?
Get answers about your specific case. Speak directly with an attorney.
Call 716.633.0374The Key Distinction
VTL §1192-2 is based upon the defendant's blood alcohol content, while VTL §1192-3 is based upon the manner in which a defendant operated his vehicle and his condition. These are separate crimes with distinct elements, and this distinction is critical when constructing a defense strategy.
If you have questions about your case, contact Law Office of Peter J. Todoro, Jr., PC at 716-633-0374.